I am a bit curious about the implications for the social media platforms themselves… Each are operated by corporate entities and governed by terms of service. While the government cannot (and should not) interfere with citizens’ access to such, is Facebook obligated to give me a platform if I’m not playing by their rules?
Originally shared by Jim Feig
The US Supreme Court just ruled that using social media is a constitutional right https://qz.com/1009546/the-us-supreme-court-just-decided-access-to-facebook-twitter-or-snapchat-is-fundamental-to-free-speech/ -via Flynx
https://qz.com/1009546/the-us-supreme-court-just-decided-access-to-facebook-twitter-or-snapchat-is-fundamental-to-free-speech
]]>
Related
Even though social media is now included as part of the First Amendment, these platforms are under no obligation to entertain malicious behavior. The First Amendment simply limits the government from suppressing speech.
]]>Even though social media is now included as part of the First Amendment, these platforms are under no obligation to entertain malicious behavior. The First Amendment simply limits the government from suppressing speech.
]]>Even though social media is now included as part of the First Amendment, these platforms are under no obligation to entertain malicious behavior. The First Amendment simply limits the government from suppressing speech.
]]>